CAS:459424-38-5，FLUOROCHOLINE

Whole body imaging in musculoskeletal oncology: when, why, and how Vicentini, Joao R. T.; Bredella, Miriam A. [Skeletal Radiology, 2023, vol. 52, # 3, p. 281 - 295] Abstract The use of whole-body imaging has become increasingly popular in oncology due to the possibility of evaluating total tumor burden with a single imaging study. This is particularly helpful in cases of widespread disease where dedicated regional imaging would make the evaluation more expensive, time consuming, and prone to more risks. Different techniques can be used, including whole-body MRI, whole-body CT, and PET-CT. Common indications include surveillance of cancer predisposing syndromes, evaluation of osseous metastases and clonal plasma cell disorders such as multiple myeloma, and evaluation of soft tissue lesions, including peripheral nerve sheath tumors. This review focuses on advanced whole-body imaging techniques and their main uses in musculoskeletal oncology.

Value of 68Ga-labeled bombesin antagonist (RM2) in the detection of primary prostate cancer comparing with [18F]fluoromethylcholine PET-CT and multiparametric MRI—a phase I/II study Beheshti, Mohsen; Taimen, Pekka; Kemppainen, Jukka; Jambor, Ivan; Müller, Andre; Loidl, Wolfgang; Kähkönen, Esa; (…) Minn, Heikki; Langsteger, Werner [European Radiology, 2023, vol. 33, # 1, p. 472 - 482] Abstract Objectives: The bombesin derivative RM2 is a GRPr antagonist with strong binding affinity to prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, the impact of [68Ga]Ga-RM2 positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for the detection of primary PCa was compared with that of [18F]FCH PET-CT and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Methods: This phase I/II study was conducted in 30 biopsy-positive PCa subjects. The patients were stratified into high (10 patients), intermediate (10 patients), and low risk (10 patients) for extraglandular metastases as defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria (NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 2016). The prostate gland was classified in 12 anatomic segments for data analysis of the imaging modalities as well as histopathologic findings. The segment with the highest radiotracer uptake was defined as the “index lesion.” All cases were scheduled to undergo prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection in intermediate- and high-risk patients. Intraprostatic and pelvic nodal [68Ga]Ga-RM2 and [18F]FCH PET-CT findings were correlated with mpMRI and histopathologic results. Results: Of the 312 analyzed regions, 120 regions (4 to 8 lesions per patient) showed abnormal findings in the prostate gland. In a region-based analysis, overall sensitivity and specificity of [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT in the detection of primary tumor were 74% and 90%, respectively, while it was 60% and 80% for [18F]FCH PET-CT and 72% and 89% for mpMRI. Although the overall sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT was higher compared to that of [18F]FCH PET-CT and mpMRI, the statistical analysis showed only significant difference between [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT and [18F]FCH PET-CT in the intermediate-risk group (p = 0.01) and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT and mpMRT in the high-risk group (p = 0.03). In the lesion-based analysis, there was no significant difference between SUVmax of [68Ga]Ga-RM2 and [18F]FCH PET-CT in the intraprostatic malignant lesions ([68Ga]Ga-RM2: mean SUVmax: 5.98 ± 4.13, median: 4.75; [18F]FCH: mean SUVmax: 6.08 ± 2.74, median: 5.5; p = 0.13). Conclusions: [68Ga]Ga-RM2 showed promising PET tracer for the detection of intraprostatic PCa in a cohort of patients with different risk stratifications. However, significant differences were only found between [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT and [18F]FCH PET-CT in the intermediate-risk group and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT and mpMRT in the high-risk group. In addition, GRP-R-based imaging seems to play a complementary role to choline-based imaging for full characterization of PCa extent and biopsy guidance in low- and intermediate-metastatic-risk PCa patients and has the potential to discriminate them from those at higher risks. Key Points: • [68Ga]Ga-RM2 is a promising PET tracer with a high detection rate for intraprostatic PCa especially in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. • GRPr-based imaging seems to play a complementary role to choline-based or PSMA-based PET/CT imaging in selected low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients for better characterization and eventually biopsy guidance of prostate cancer disease.

Salvage Involved-Field and Extended-Field Radiation Therapy in Positron Emission Tomography–Positive Nodal Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Outcomes and Patterns of Failure Pêtre, Adeline; Quivrin, Magali; Briot, Nathalie; Boustani, Jihane; Martin, Etienne; Bessieres, Igor; Cochet, Alexandre; Créhange, Gilles [Advances in Radiation Oncology, 2023, vol. 8, # 1, art. no. 101040] Abstract Purpose: The optimal salvage pelvic treatment for nodal recurrences in prostate cancer is not yet clearly defined. We aimed to compare outcomes of salvage involved-field radiation therapy (s-IFRT) and salvage extended-field radiation therapy (s-EFRT) for positron emission tomography/computed tomography–positive nodal-recurrent prostate cancer and to analyze patterns of progressions after salvage nodal radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: Patients with 18F-fluorocholine or 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography/computed tomography–positive nodal-recurrent prostate cancer and treated with s-IFRT or s-EFRT were retrospectively selected. Time to biochemical failure, time to palliative androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and distant metastasis–free survival were analyzed. Results: Between 2009 and 2019, 86 patients were treated with salvage nodal radiation therapy: 38 with s-IFRT and 48 with s-EFRT. After a median follow-up of 41.9 months (5.4-122.1 months), 47 patients presented a further relapse: 31 after s-IFRT and 16 after s-EFRT, with only 1 in-field relapse. The median time to palliative ADT was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.3-93.5 months) in the s-IFRT group and not yet reached (95% CI, 40.3 months to not yet reached) in the s-EFRT group (P =.010). The 3-year biochemical failure–free rate was 70.2% (95% CI, 51.5%-82.9%) with s-IFRT and 73.9% (95% CI, 55.4%-85.7%) with s-EFRT (P =.657). The 3-year distant metastasis–free survival was 74.1% (95% CI, 56.0%-85.7%) with s-IFRT and 82.0% (95% CI, 63.0%-91.8%) with s-EFRT (P =.338). Conclusions: s-EFRT and s-IFRT for positron emission tomography–positive nodal-recurrent prostate cancer provide excellent local control. Time to palliative ADT was longer following s-EFRT than following s-IFRT.